Any Winston Churchill Here?

Looking For Peace

Looking For Peace

A fanatic is one who can’t change his mind and won’t change the subject — said by Sir Winston Churchill. The reason I liked him is parce que his positive role during the World War II.

It was September 1939 that shook the whole Europe when Hitler attacked Poland. Hitler wanted to invade the whole of the Europe and other countries in Central Asia and further to South Asia. The Allied Forces — France, Great Britain and Poland — came in to being soon after Germany’s attack on Poland.

At that time, Soviet Union asked the Baltic Countries to allow stationing Soviet troops in their countries which Finland rejected and it was invaded by Soviet Union successfully. France and Great Britain was of the view that Soviet invasion on Poland is one reason inasmuch as it wanted to embark in World War II. No one knew that one of the deadliest fights between Soviet Union and Germany — the famous Operation Barbarossa which is also considered to be the biggest military offensive in terms of manpower, logistics and other resources — would take place later during World War II. Anyone of you who have read Operation Barbarossa in detail would be known to its appalling events.

Sir Winston Churchill wanted to have peace in Europe. The statesman would do every possible thing he could to stop Hitler from pursuing his evil aims. But then Great Britain was embroiled in the world war II as it became imperative — in order to help protect Europe from getting in the evil hands of Hitler’s Nazis.

There’s a reason to reminisce the World War II that, in all seriousness, jolted the whole of the Europe once. An alien down to earth yet won’t believe once knowing what Europe was during 1939 to 1945 and what it’s now: the amity amongst the nations prevail there, yet between the belligerent countries of World War II.

The reason to jot down about World War II is to trot out this fine example under the limelight that peace is always possible despite past wars and feud, just in the circumstance that we’re really willing to win the peace.

At present, India and Pakistan stands at the same point where the Axis Forces and Allied Forces stood thus far 1945 — the end of world war II — and sought for peace after hellishly busy and bloody wars. India and Pakistan have fought three wars to this day. Have we not yet learned enough of the lessons after three wars that we start seeking for true peace in a bona fide way?

Both the countries, tout de suite, need to stop railroading other country and come to the negotiation table and resolve all the long standing issues.

What do you think India can invade Pakistan, huh? No! So why such an attitude of infant?

What do you think we can resolve the Kashmir Issue under such circumstances? Resolving the violation of Indus-basin treaty issue under such circumstances?

What do you think we can resolve the issue of uncalled for heavy presence of India in Afghanistan overtly/covertly aimed to destabilize Pakistan?

What do you think we can resolve the issue of India’s unwarranted involvement in Baluchistan under such circumstances?

Are all the issues to be decided with the help of war?

Why do we always talk about banning Indian TV channels and Indian movies in Pakistan? If that’s the case, we should be banning American and Brit channels and movies as long as they’re killing our innocent people in drone attacks and abducting our Pakistanis and transporting them to Gitmo. Why just one flavor of patriotism, I ask again?

This isn’t because I’m a Pakistani so as I’m saying that, but it’s also quite apparent that India is unsubmissive to have peace between both countries and often we see unprovoked act of aggression from India’s side. For heaven’s sake, stop over. Both sides of the borders need to shun the hawkish attitude — and India needs to reconsider its behavior more than Pakistan. We, both the countries, are ineffectually squandering our each day and making a big lot of humans suffer on account of morbid hawkish attitude.

Repeating the history often remind us to take prudent decisions regarding present and future. By ill hap, there’s no ruling leader today on both sides of the border of India and Pakistan who’d raise the hunt of the prudent ideologies of the statesman Winston Churchill.

History will be kind to me for I intend to write it — Sir Winston Churchill

8 Responses to Any Winston Churchill Here?

  1. neel123 says:

    First of all, Axis force and Allied force comparison is not applicable here. India and Pakistan can not be compared by any stretch of imagination, unless you are in total denial.

    India is going to invade Pakistan is a myth, we Indians could not care less about Pakistan.

    Kashmir is India’s internal matter. Only after the Tibetians get Tibet, and the Baloch get Balochistan can there be any change in India’s stand.

    India’s presence in Afghanistsn is no fucking business of any Pakistani. It is only for the Afghans to decide. Pakistan’s popularity amongst the Afghans is lower than the Americans.

    Balochistan is the way of making you Pakistanis having a taste of your own medicine.

    Forget about banning, You Pakistanis are the shameless hypocrites that would see Indian TV & Cinema, your cricketers would cry like kids to play in IPL.

    Peace will not come on Pakistan’s terms, not through Indian concessions, and certainly not through blackmail.

    India is in no rush……. history is not about few years or decades……

    • Absar says:

      @ Neel

      It seems that you’re one of those hawkish and blindfolded people following RSS, Shiv Sena.

      If Baluchistan is for Baloch, Gujarat is for Gujaratis, Manipur, Assam and Nagaland is for the people of Nagas and Khalistan is for Sikhs, and so on, no? Poor logic, neel. Keep emotional state of mind aside.

      India care less about Pakistan, you say, and that’s why India feels Pakistan is a great threat to India; hence it surged the defence budget to 35% when Pakistan did that too. Are your also one of those, I say again, who’re trying to satisfy their morbid egotism under superiority complex, huh?

      Let’s make the facts straight on the basis of only facts, not emotionalism, and be prudent.

  2. Absar says:

    And India’s presence in Afghanistan has become a strong concern of Pakistan because we’re on daily basis apprehending Raw agents at the border side.

    Why India all of a sudden became so much humane in Afghanistan that it never was/is in Somalia or Nigeria and other poverty-stricken countries?

  3. Absar says:

    But we’re not debating on it, neither the write up is about it. We’re talking about Peace. You don’t seem to accept Peace.

  4. neel123 says:

    Repeating …
    Peace will not come on Pakistan’s terms, not through Indian concessions, and certainly not through blackmail.

    • Absar says:

      So you imply that peace won’t come, neither you want to see it as you haven’t mentioned any alternative source to ascertain the peace, eh! :S

  5. neel123 says:

    Learn from Bangladesh, and you Pakistanis will know what is the way to peace….. it is not rocket science !

    • Absar says:

      Hmm. Again a non sequitur, neel. And I can see a broad hatred all along the line. No offence meant, but I’d like to quote Sir Winston Churchill again: A fanatic is one who can’t change his mind and won’t change the subject.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s